In the past few years, a lot of things have got me thinking about intersectional feminism. Firstly, the Gender and Women’s Studies class I took in my first year of uni; a choice arising from simple curiosity and a requirement to pick an extra module, and culminating in a burning passion for the cause. The first lecture introducting the term ‘intersectional feminism’, previously alien to me, and the subsequent weeks of studying feminism intersected with race, sexuality, gender identity, migrant status, class, religion, and more. The realisation that my own experiences fit into just one strand of this deeply and intricately woven fabric. This was when I became interested in feminisms, and in externalising my concern and compassion towards those so often ignored in the western feminist agenda.
In Emma Watson’s famous UN speech; in Judith Butler’s theoretical writing; in Deborah Frances White’s commentary, I find feminism. All informative, rallying and established in their own way, this was feminism as I originally perceived it: icons. Almost like valuing the glamour and glitz of hollywood and ignoring the perverseness that lies underneath. Beneath those feminist voices lie the reason that they exist in the first place.
In my feminism, I try to listen as equally as I speak. Perhaps my greatest praise of social media is that it gives unheard voices a platform, and I try to listen to as many of them as possible. It makes my perception of feminism grittier, messier and therefore more real. It has taught me that there is no binary between a feminist and unfeminist act, agenda or individual. Lines can be crossed, intentions masked.
A recent article by The Guardian revealed that the Spice Girls t-shirts in aid of Comic Relief were produced in ‘inhuman’ conditions, with factory workers paid the equivalent of 35p per four in a 54-hour week. First response: appalled, disgusted, angry. This abominable action has been declared as unbeknown to Comic Relief, The Spice Girls, or their commissioned retailer Represent, yet it reminds us of the institutionalised abuses of human rights that are enacted on a daily bases. The Spice Girls, as Deborah Frances White declares on The Guilty Feminist, are a gateway drug to more active feminist attitudes. Yet the mistreatment and abuse of workers producing their t-shirts is far from a feminist act. Again, we are reminded of intersections; race, nationality, class. An issue of these is a feminist issue. No, The Spice Girls were not directly to blame for this, and yes, they are a cultural icon tied to girl power and feminism – but that does not unhinge them from the responsibility of ensuring that every act they undertake is humane, feminist, and in line with their ideology.
‘Saying the conditions appeared to be “far beyond the normal illegalities” at factories in Bangladesh, Dominique Muller, the policy director at the campaign group Labour Behind the Label, added: “It is absolutely essential that celebrities, charities and brands ensure that their goods are made in factories which pay a decent wage and provide decent work.”’
The Guardian, ‘Revealed: Spice Girls T-shirts made in factory paying staff 35p an hour’, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/20/spice-girls-comic-relief-tshirts-made-bangladesh-factory-paying-staff-35p-an-hour
The lesson here is to remember that fact: there is no binary between a feminist and unfeminist act, agenda or individual.
In this same line of thought, it is essential to pick apart the cultural understanding of ‘feminism’ itself. In contemporary feminism, the notion of ‘white feminism’ has been understood to convey the exclusionary way in which feminism functions in the western world. In largely denying the experiences of non-white women and other minority groups, the symbolic ‘woman’ of feminism is painted as white and middle class. In the predominantly white women championed as feminist icons on magazine covers; in the institutional racism that prevents women of colour from achieving more senior roles; in the idealised white-and-slim-but-curvy body image, we are confronted with feminism as a white middle class fight.
Through this homogenising of the white middle-class woman, western feminism becomes a symbol of privilege rather than of struggle. The class and racial privilege of the ‘we can do it!’ woman insinuates that feminism is a philosophy driven by vocality and forced self-inclusion; masking the inherent exclusion and invisibility that takes place within it.
‘The notion of a generic “woman” functions in feminist thought much the way the notion of generic “man” has functioned in Western philosophy; it obscures the heterogeneity of women and cuts off examination of the significance of such heterogeneity for feminist theory and political activity.’
Elizabeth V. Spelman, Inessential Woman, p. ix
If you’re not a white middle-class feminist, you’ll be all too aware of the exclusion that takes place in modern feminism. If you are, however, at least white, you’re likely unaware – like me a few years ago. I identified with the feminism I saw, so I took no issue. This is why it is so vital as people of privilege that we listen to other people’s experiences, rather than just talk about our own. The media may be a wider force, but we are all co-authors of moderm feminist attitudes. When we realise the injustice within a movement that inherently strives for the very opposite, it’s easy to simply be angry and resentful. I started noticing that all of the fitness accounts I followed on Instagram were those of slim, conventionally attractive white women, and I felt mad that this body type alone is exclusively seen as ‘goals’.
Now, that would be a valid feeling if it weren’t for the fact that I am in charge of who I follow. There’s a common misconception with certain elements of media that there is a lack of diversity in the people it showcases. As Kim-Julie Hansen states on the podcast Talking Tastebuds, this is not true. It is not lack of diversity, but lack of representation. We are all consumers and it is our choice what we consume. Sure, the algorithms may suggest more skinny white athletes to match our the skinny white athletes we already follow, or possibly because they are (problematically) the most popular, but that doesn’t prevent us from actively seeking out different voices. Making the conscious decision to listen to a diverse range of people should be the most basic action taken by any intersectional feminist. Maybe you don’t have the time to lobby for important causes or use your power on a greater level, but you certainly have the time to diversify your feed.
With this in mind, I think that this singular notion of white feminism comes as a result of the increasing passivity of the general public. We are quite literally drip fed from our phones, instilled with the news, influences and wants that it is assumed we should have. It is all too easy for us to sit comfortably in the faux-progressive umbrella of white middle-class feminism – if you are white and middle class, that is. As with many issues, the solution comes with us doing more.
Pride and vocality is so important to progress, but much like the injustice that took place behind the Spice Girls’ campaign for empowerment, we can’t forget the voices that go unheard. Remember those people, listen to those people, and fight for those people. Use social media and online platforms not as the bullies that reign our emotions, but as the tool through which we orchestrate our own ecosystem of voices. Your feed should reflect your ideology, it’s as simple as that. And beyond this, remember that intersectional feminism (and life – because I think many of us need reminding) stretches far beyond the electronic plane. No one is on Instagram shouting out about poverty pride. Class is an intersection that is thoroughly unspoken about, because who wants to shout about their impoverished circumstances? It’s dehumanising. It’s wonderful that so many communities and people are gaining confidence and pride in their identity, but we mustn’t forget those who are continually shamed, deemed ‘less than’.
I’m not writing this post to attack people. Feminism has so many shapes and sizes, and ultimately the textbook definition will always dictate that you are a feminist if you believe in the equality of the sexes. However, in a world so complex and diverse as we now have, it isn’t enough for everyone to just believe. When BAME people receive little digital spotlight, when women with disabilities are excluded from what is ‘conventionally attractive’, when trans women are denied their womanhood altogether, and when poverty stricken women are too destitute to even share their story – when all of this is our world, it is not enough to believe. We must do something.









